Get Started

Contact Us For A Consultation

Have a question? We're here to help. Send us a message and we'll be in touch.

Case Facts: Foreign National (FN) and his US Citizen(USC) spouse, who filed their one-step adjustment several years prior, came in to see me for a consultation. They received a NOID for the I-130 and wanted new counsel to represent them in the matter.

They previously had two interviews for the I-485. The NOID for the I-130 was based on the assertion that the petitioner and beneficiary had not established they had a valid marriage and/or resided together. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Adjudicator made the case for the NOID using some of the following arguments:

  • During the interview the beneficiary had a very thick accent and hence the interviewer was not convinced that the petitioner or the beneficiary could communicate and establish a bona fide relationship;
  • The G-325A, Biographic Information, listed the date the petitioner and beneficiary had moved in together but during the interview both testified that they had moved in together a month later;
  • The service held that a jointly owned vehicle by petitioner and beneficiary purchased several years ago was for the “purpose” of only showing a fraudulent joint purchase and only used by petitioner. The implication was that this joint purchase could not be truly viewed as an indication that petitioner and beneficiary were in a bona fide relationship and were purchasing the vehicle together;
  • The service contended that one of the tax year filings did not have the joint address of the petitioner and beneficiary and that the tax returns provided were copies and hence not credible;
  • The service asserted that certain credit cards for the petitioner showed purchases were made in another city outside of where the petitioner and beneficiary were purportedly living hence questioning whether the petitioner and beneficiary lived together;
  • The service also stated that the lease provided by petitioner was not “official” in nature and concluded it did not hold any value for immigration purposes;
  • The service concluded that the photos provided by the petitioner and beneficiary were not credible because it seemed that the beneficiary was just “posing” to show they were married.

As I reviewed the NOID and interviewed the couple, it became clear to me that the interviewer in this case was reaching conclusions without any basis in fact or even case law.

In brief summary, here is how we countered the NOID arguments laid out by the service:

We argued that having an accent should not or could not be used as a guide to ascertaining the bona fide nature of the marriage. There was no case law that mandated it and the service’s conclusion was baseless. For example, one of the hallmark cases which speaks to the issue of a bona fide marriage, BARK v. IMMIGRATION NATURALIZATION SERVICE. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. 511 F.2d 1200 (9th Cir. 1975), discusses how the intent of the parties is key to establishing bona fide marriage. There is no mention of accents of speaking English fluently. In this case, the beneficiary did have a thick accent but in fact was educated in English and could fluently read and write English. We also provided affidavits from the petitioner, the beneficiary, and their friends who corroborated the beneficiary’s ability to communicate in English.

OUR BLOGS

Recent Articles

US immigration application and consular visa interview

My Immigrant Visa Case Is Stuck in Administrative Processing? What Should I Do?

Sep 22, 2023
The process of acquiring an immigrant visa can be complex and intimidating, especially when encountering the term “administrative processing.” Many applicants find themselves stuck at this stage, wondering what it means and how to proceed. This article will provide an insightful understanding of administrative processing, how long it typically takes, why an immigrant visa might […]
Read More
application to register permanent residence or adjust status form and green card

I Want to Apply for Adjustment of Status (Green Card). Do I Need a Lawyer?

Sep 15, 2023
Embarking on the journey through the labyrinth of immigration law can be daunting, especially if you’re not intimately familiar with the system. The processes are replete with intricacies, the jargon used is often perplexing, and the consequences of even a minor error can be dramatic. As you prepare to apply for an adjustment of status, […]
Read More
K-1 VISA united states of america white gold ring with diamond

I Want to Apply for a K-1 Visa: Do I Need a Lawyer?

Sep 08, 2023
Deciding to marry a non-U.S. citizen is a major milestone. With it comes the bureaucratic labyrinth that is the U.S. immigration process. At the heart of this journey is the K-1 Visa, often referred to as the fiancé visa. The process may appear straightforward, but it can be surprisingly complex, leading many to question: “Do […]
Read More
US citizenship and immigration services on flag of united states of america

I Received an N-14. Should I Hire a Lawyer?

Sep 01, 2023
The path to U.S. citizenship is a journey through an intricate maze of laws, processes, and paperwork. Each step taken is a pivotal decision, leading you either closer to your dream or into a complex web of legal hurdles. The receipt of an N-14 Form marks one such decisive intersection in this journey. This document, […]
Read More
letter or document with unexpected news from african boss

I Received a NOID. Should I Hire a Lawyer to Respond?

Aug 25, 2023
You’ve gone through the rigorous and meticulous process of filing an immigration application, only to receive a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). A wave of uncertainty and confusion washes over you. You are left wondering, “What is a NOID?” and “Should I hire an immigration lawyer […]
Read More

I Received an RFE. Should I Hire a Lawyer to Respond?

Aug 11, 2023
Receiving a Request for Evidence (RFE) from USCIS can be a nerve-wracking experience. An RFE, also known as a request for evidence, is a notification from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) indicating the need for additional evidence to process an immigration application. If you’re wondering whether you need the services of an immigration […]
Read More
Show More
CALL US 630-392-8101